Fine Print

See what you've agreed to, in one list.

What MIT Technology Review's terms say

D privacy grade · technologyreview.com · News & reference

MIT Technology Review's terms of service and privacy policy have 9 rated points: 0 serious, 3 bad, 5 worth knowing and 1 good. 7 apply whenever you use the site, signed in or not; 2 only once you have an account.

I have a MIT Technology Review account I only visit it Adds MIT Technology Review to your list and compares it with the other sites you use.
Signed in or not

Whenever you use MIT Technology Review

Bad 2

Worth knowing 4

  • There is a date of the last update of the agreements

    Where it says this ↗
  • Do Not Track (DNT) headers are ignored and you are tracked anyway even if you set this header

    Do Not Track (DNT) headers are ignored and you are tracked anyway even if you set this header.

    Where it says this ↗
  • Spidering, crawling, or accessing the site through any automated means is not allowed

    Where it says this ↗
  • First-party cookies are used

    Where it says this ↗

Good 1

  • A list of all cookies used by the service is provided

    A list of all cookies set by the website is provided

    Where it says this ↗
With an account

If you have a MIT Technology Review account

Bad 1

  • You must provide your legal name, pseudonyms are not allowed

    Created by Docbot version v3

    Where it says this ↗

Worth knowing 1

  • This service is only available to users over a certain age

    This service is only available to users over a certain age (18)

    Where it says this ↗

The documents

Ratings by ToS;DR volunteers; they can lag behind the current terms. Not legal advice.